[mcclim-devel] Gadget based accepting-values

[Troels Henriksen]

Clinton Ebadi <clinton at unknownlamer.org> writes:

> My big question now is: is it ok if the gadget based
> accepting-values is not user extensible?

Fine by me. My previous statements were based on the fallacious
assumption that the spec already specified most of what was needed,
and if that is not the case a non-extensible implementation is better
than none at all.
-- 
\  Troels
/\ Henriksen