Remove canvas shapes by tag?
Matthew Stickney
mtstickney at gmail.com
Thu Oct 13 18:44:12 UTC 2016
Sorry, was going from memory and mis-copied it. You want
LTK:WIDGET-PATH instead.
Ltk is really good about being easy to extend, which is useful for
things like starkits or tcl extensions that don't really belong in a
tk binding. I've found that the major drawback to Tk is that it's
tricky to build new parts out of existing widgets[0]. It's got the
most straightforward and least bizarre widget API I've seen in any GUI
toolkit, though -- worthy of emulation, IMO.
[0] Technically, Tk widgets don't really exhibit "closure" -- you
can't build a widget out of other widgets, without resorting to one of
the object-based shims around Tk. There is some information about
creating so-called "megawidgets", but it's not as simple as you would
hope.
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 7:29 PM, Ryan <pixeloutlaw at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmm I seem to be missing
>
> (wish-pathname ...)
>
> Is it a standard LTk function?
> Thanks for confirming that LTk is indeed missing the "delete by tag"
> command.
> The format-wish is a nice little option until people can officially add the
> newest features.
> I really like Tk conceptually. It is nice to have a universal GUI shell that
> is language agnostic and not browser based.
>
>
> On 10/12/2016 02:03 PM, Matthew Stickney wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 4:02 PM, Matthew Stickney <mtstickney at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> then open up the tk source and search around for strings that could be
>>> that
>>> command
>>
>> Sorry, I mean the LTK source. Having to read the tk source itself
>> would be considerably more involved.
>>
>
>
More information about the ltk-user
mailing list