[ltk-user] Socket problem....

[Kenny Tilton]

Peter Herth wrote:

>>As expected, all sends are the same (using a counter to count them). But
>>this makes everything work:
>>
>>Instead of "wm withdraw ." I do "wm iconify ."
>>
>>The idea of doing either is to keep the user from having to watch Tk
>>assemble the window widget by widget. Looks funny, feels slow. My
>>Cells-driven approach does not think about when to do things, so it just
>>shoots ideas over to Tk as it thinks of them. :) I could work on that,
>>but beginning with a withdraw or iconify and then ending with deiconify
>>looked like a quick win. Someone on the TCL list told me iconfiy might
>>put an icon on the desktop and to use withdraw instead.
>>
>>Maybe I should just hold off on the PACK of the top widget(s) in a
>>window until everyone else is packed (the other way to handle creeping
>>widget assembly).
>>
>>Thoughts?
>>    
>>
>
>I actually do withdraw windows as soon as they are created to fill
>them in the background. So that works with all my programs. 
>

Good to know, thx. Yeah, worked for me, too, until I did Something. 
Programming! :)

kt