[ltk-user] no error stream use

[Peter Herth]

On 2/2/06, Kenny Tilton <ktilton at nyc.rr.com> wrote:
> Is there some reason the error stream from Tk is not being used? In
> Celtic I bound that to a second global and read that (with read-line,
> not read since the error output is not Lisp friendly) before trying to
> read the regular stream.
>
> As it is read-data just flails away at error text until it hits
> something that upsets the reader, such as a comma.

Well, there is no deep reason - besides I do not know offhand how the
support for a seperate error stream across all the lisps Ltk runs on
is. For sure, it probably would remove some of the weird errors of Ltk
when Tk sends something unreadable...

Peter