From attila.lendvai at gmail.com Tue Sep 1 13:47:41 2009 From: attila.lendvai at gmail.com (Attila Lendvai) Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:47:41 +0200 Subject: [local-time-devel] Bug: Obtaining the current time on CCL/Windows In-Reply-To: <4A9A92B0.7040906@web.de> References: <4A9A92B0.7040906@web.de> Message-ID: > Can anyone else confirm this behaviour of the library when using CCL on > Windows? no need for confirmations, it's obviously different on windows. could you send your #+ changes as a darcs patch? (darcs record, darcs send -o /tmp/c.patch) or better yet, look at the link below, and based on that send a patch that uses the windoze equivalents of gettimofday? http://www.openasthra.com/c-tidbits/gettimeofday-function-for-windows/ -- attila From essdir at web.de Tue Sep 1 16:46:33 2009 From: essdir at web.de (Dirk Esser) Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 18:46:33 +0200 Subject: [local-time-devel] Bug: Obtaining the current time on CCL/Windows In-Reply-To: References: <4A9A92B0.7040906@web.de> Message-ID: <4A9D4FE9.8030605@web.de> Attila Lendvai wrote: >> Can anyone else confirm this behaviour of the library when using CCL on >> Windows? >> > > no need for confirmations, it's obviously different on windows. > > could you send your #+ changes as a darcs patch? (darcs record, darcs > send -o /tmp/c.patch) > The patch is attached to this email. > or better yet, look at the link below, and based on that send a patch > that uses the windoze equivalents of gettimofday? > > http://www.openasthra.com/c-tidbits/gettimeofday-function-for-windows/ > > Since the fallback implementation works for me, I did not really investigate this matter very deeply. But I will see what I can do, if I have a little bit of time on my hands this week. -- Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we. -------------- next part -------------- An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed... Name: cclwindows.patch URL: