From wagwilk at telusplanet.net  Wed Oct 15 20:02:00 2008
From: wagwilk at telusplanet.net (wagwilk at telusplanet.net)
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:02:00 -0600 (MDT)
Subject: [local-time-devel] Errors using timestamp+
Message-ID: <30291400.3081441224100920708.JavaMail.nitido@priv-edtnes94>

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/local-time-devel/attachments/20081015/4f5cfe67/attachment.html>

From attila.lendvai at gmail.com  Wed Oct 15 20:12:19 2008
From: attila.lendvai at gmail.com (Attila Lendvai)
Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2008 22:12:19 +0200
Subject: [local-time-devel] Errors using timestamp+
In-Reply-To: <30291400.3081441224100920708.JavaMail.nitido@priv-edtnes94>
References: <30291400.3081441224100920708.JavaMail.nitido@priv-edtnes94>
Message-ID: <b54b34af0810151312o207bb92bi81ead2bd85c851fe@mail.gmail.com>

> I'm experiencing intermittant errors using timestamp+ on SBCL:

which platform? i guess it's x86.

which version of local-time? using anything else than the darcs head
is unwise, especially if it's not about a production system.

hth,

-- 
 attila