From scaekenberghe at common-lisp.net Fri Jan 6 20:46:10 2006 From: scaekenberghe at common-lisp.net (Sven Van Caekenberghe) Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 21:46:10 +0100 Subject: [kpax-devel] Welcome! Message-ID: <762FA6AF-3213-4B21-A82F-E9DE76B904A9@common-lisp.net> Welcome to the new KPAX-dev mailinglist. KPAX is a Common Lisp Web Application Framework. Please refer to http://homepage.mac.com/svc/kpax/index.html for more information. Greetings, Sven -- Sven Van Caekenberghe - http://homepage.mac.com/svc Beta Nine - software engineering - http://www.beta9.be "Lisp isn't a language, it's a building material." - Alan Kay From scaekenberghe at common-lisp.net Mon Jan 9 13:34:27 2006 From: scaekenberghe at common-lisp.net (Sven Van Caekenberghe) Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2006 14:34:27 +0100 Subject: [kpax-devel] Re: KPAX patches In-Reply-To: <94CA6CB2-BBA1-4CE2-9029-DAE7931254F8@beta9.be> References: <94CA6CB2-BBA1-4CE2-9029-DAE7931254F8@beta9.be> Message-ID: On 09 Jan 2006, at 14:19, Nicky Peeters wrote: > OK - applied. Sven -- Sven Van Caekenberghe - http://homepage.mac.com/svc Beta Nine - software engineering - http://www.beta9.be From scaekenberghe at common-lisp.net Tue Jan 10 22:26:12 2006 From: scaekenberghe at common-lisp.net (Sven Van Caekenberghe) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:26:12 +0100 Subject: [kpax-devel] Re: Patch to s-sysdeps for better SBCL support In-Reply-To: <99fda5cd0601100951y5ac76930va8364d2ef84dd9f8@mail.gmail.com> References: <99fda5cd0601100951y5ac76930va8364d2ef84dd9f8@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: Hi Ari, On 10 Jan 2006, at 18:51, Ari Johnson wrote: > The attached file is a patch (with instructions to apply using patch > -p1) to your s-sysdeps library. The file includes notes about the > parts that don't work in SBCL 0.8.16 (which is what my Debian 'sarge' > installation runs) and thus need to be commented out. I made these > changes in order to get s-sysdeps working sufficiently with SBCL > 0.8.16 to run KPAX on my server. > > Thanks for your time. > > Ari Johnson > Thanks for your patches. I did not take them over litterally because I worked on S-SYSDEPS just yesterday, and already added some sbcl specific code contributed by others to other projects. You didn't use the name argument when creating a new process. You are using a different locking primitive (with-mutex vs with- recursive-lock), which is the right one ? Thanks for the testing and feedback, Sven -- Sven Van Caekenberghe - http://homepage.mac.com/svc Beta Nine - software engineering - http://www.beta9.be "Lisp isn't a language, it's a building material." - Alan Kay