[iolib-devel] New patches: 26-Dec-2009

[Peter Keller]

On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 02:32:14AM -0600, Peter Keller wrote:
> It only happened once for me so far in my testing. Had I known it wasn't 
> easily reproducable, I would have gotten a full backtrace.

It figures I'd get the failure 5 seconds after sending the emai:

0] backtrace

0: (IOLIB.MULTIPLEX::%DISPATCH-EVENT
    #S(IOLIB.MULTIPLEX::FD-ENTRY
       :FD 8
       :READ-HANDLER NIL
       :WRITE-HANDLER NIL
       :ERROR-CALLBACK NIL)
    :WRITE
    :ERROR
    1478938.390490213d0)
1: (IOLIB.MULTIPLEX::%HANDLE-ONE-FD
    #<event base, 2 FDs monitored, using: #<epoll(4) multiplexer> {B2080C1}>
    (8 (:ERROR :READ :WRITE))
    1478938.390490213d0
    #<unavailable argument>)
2: (IOLIB.MULTIPLEX::DISPATCH-FD-EVENTS-ONCE
    #<event base, 2 FDs monitored, using: #<epoll(4) multiplexer> {B2080C1}>
    7.825390378013253d0
    1478938.390490213d0)
3: ((SB-PCL::FAST-METHOD IOLIB.MULTIPLEX:EVENT-DISPATCH
     (IOLIB.MULTIPLEX:EVENT-BASE))
    #<unavailable argument>
    #<unavailable argument>
    #<event base, 2 FDs monitored, using: #<epoll(4) multiplexer> {B2080C1}>)[:EXTERNAL]
4: ((LAMBDA
        (SB-PCL::.PV. SB-PCL::.NEXT-METHOD-CALL. SB-PCL::.ARG0. SB-INT:&MORE
         SB-PCL::.DFUN-MORE-CONTEXT. SB-PCL::.DFUN-MORE-COUNT.))
    #<unused argument>
    #<unused argument>
    #<event base, 2 FDs monitored, using: #<epoll(4) multiplexer> {B2080C1}>
    -303312229
    2)
5: ((FLET %RUN-SERVER))
6: (RUN-SERVER :HOST #/ip/0.0.0.0 :PORT 10000 :NEW-PROCESS NIL :TIMEOUT 3600)
7: (SB-INT:SIMPLE-EVAL-IN-LEXENV
    (RUN-SERVER :PORT 10000 :NEW-PROCESS NIL :TIMEOUT 3600)
    #<NULL-LEXENV>)
8: (SB-EXT:INTERACTIVE-EVAL
    (RUN-SERVER :PORT 10000 :NEW-PROCESS NIL :TIMEOUT 3600))[:EXTERNAL]
9: (SB-IMPL::REPL-FUN NIL)
10: ((LAMBDA ()))
11: (SB-IMPL::%WITH-REBOUND-IO-SYNTAX #<CLOSURE (LAMBDA #) {AD29EAD}>)
12: (SB-IMPL::TOPLEVEL-REPL NIL)
13: (SB-IMPL::TOPLEVEL-INIT)
14: ((LABELS SB-IMPL::RESTART-LISP))

-pete