[imp-hackers] Another topic: ANSI standard test suite

Ville Voutilainen ville.voutilainen at gmail.com
Fri Jun 26 15:36:17 UTC 2009


On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Sam Steingold<sds at gnu.org> wrote:
> Moreover, since this is an ANSI test suite, no #+clisp/#+gcl/#+abcl
> should ever be present there.

We need such declarations to disable random method combination from
the tests, because abcl doesn't support the long form of
define-method-combination yet.
If such things aren't present, the test doesn't run on abcl. I don't
think that's a reasonable
approach, because we can test non-clos things with the tests just fine.

I don't think the results of the tests are implementation-specific
anywhere. We certainly
didn't change any of the results to be abcl-specific in any way.




More information about the implementation-hackers mailing list