[imp-hackers] cl-ext:exit

[Nikodemus Siivola]

2009/7/10 Sam Steingold <sds at gnu.org>:

> why not just EXT?

Because EXT is burned by history: some implementations already have an
EXT package (eg. CMUCL), which contains implementation specific
extensions.

CL-EXT does not exist yet anywhere, as far as I know, and hence it is
up for grabs -- and makes a decent name for a "semistandard" package.

Cheers,

 -- Nikodemus