[imp-hackers] cl-ext:exit

[Jean-Claude Beaudoin]

I hope it is understood that such "finalizers" are above and beyond
any unwind-protects that would have to be honored. Then the question
of order of execution between them and unwind-protects needs to be
addressed.

Cheers,

Jean-Claude Beaudoin

On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:32 AM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <
juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com> wrote:

> Could we introduce also the notion of "finalizers" or things to be
> done before exiting, perhaps in the form of a special variable with a
> list of handlers? QUIT then would have to take an additional option,
> deciding whether to honor or not those handlers.
>
> Juanjo
>
> On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 2:09 AM, Sam Steingold<sds at gnu.org> wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 7:31 PM, Raymond Toy<toy.raymond at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> I changed the list a bit late, but cl-ext:exit seems reasonable.  But
> >> you didn't mention exactly what you want cl-ext:exit to do.  Can you
> >> propose something more concrete?
> >
> > http://clisp.cons.org/impnotes/quit.html
> >
> >
> > --
> > Sam Steingold <http://sds.podval.org>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Implementation-hackers mailing list
> > Implementation-hackers at common-lisp.net
> > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementation-hackers
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
> c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain)
> http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Implementation-hackers mailing list
> Implementation-hackers at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/implementation-hackers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/implementation-hackers/attachments/20090702/c9485db2/attachment.html>