[ieeefp-tests-devel] C results

[Christophe Rhodes]

Raymond Toy <toy at rtp.ericsson.se> writes:

> There are some surprises there.  CMUCL/sparc has failures on cosh and
> sin.  The C version shows no such errors, but does shows errors on
> atan2, which doesn't happen on CMUCL/sparc.  

atan2 is currently untested in lisp, I think.

> More study needed, I think.

Definitely :-)

Cheers,

Christophe
-- 
http://www-jcsu.jesus.cam.ac.uk/~csr21/       +44 1223 510 299/+44 7729 383 757
(set-pprint-dispatch 'number (lambda (s o) (declare (special b)) (format s b)))
(defvar b "~&Just another Lisp hacker~%")    (pprint #36rJesusCollegeCambridge)