[Gsll-devel] with-ode-integration macro problem on clisp

[Liam Healy]

There is now a local function #'next-step to replace the symbol macro
make-next-step.  This is in the refactoring-callbacks branch which
will eventually be merged into master.

(Please keep gsll-devel in the cc when following up threads from the
list so that others can follow the conversation.  Thank you.)

Liam

On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Mirko Vukovic <mirko.vukovic at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 9:51 PM, Liam Healy <lhealy at common-lisp.net> wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 1, 2009 at 9:17 PM, Mirko Vukovic <mirko.vukovic at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> According to folks on the clisp mailing list and hyperspec
>>> (http://www.lispworks.com/documentation/HyperSpec/Body/06_aaaa.htm),
>>> the bodies of simple loops can contain only *compound forms*.  So, the
>>> original code was out of spec.  Live and learn :-)
>>
>> So it is.  Who knew.   If you have a git patch you can email, go ahead
>> and send it, I will apply it (I've never applied a git patch from
>> email, but I'll figure it out) and check it in.
>
> Give me a few days.  I have a conference to organize, and I have been
> having too much fun with lisp :-)
>
>>
>> While you're chasing down CLISP problems, I noticed a bunch of them
>> when running the tests.  If those problems turn out to be in GSLL we
>> should try to patch them up.
>
> Yes, I saw them.  Most of them were due to precision errors (reducing
> tolerances helped), but there were a few that completely failed
> (basis-spline among them).  I will try to take a look, but nothing
> will happen soon.
>
>>
>> Liam
>>
>