From strandh at labri.fr  Sun Jan 14 14:47:45 2007
From: strandh at labri.fr (Robert Strandh)
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 15:47:45 +0100
Subject: [flexichain-devel] write privileges for group members
Message-ID: <17834.17041.471555.158934@serveur5.labri.fr>

Hello,

Could you please change the mode of /project/flexichain/www and 
/project/flexichain/www/download so as to allow write operations for
group members?

Thanks in advance,
-- 
Robert Strandh

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Greenspun's Tenth Rule of Programming: any sufficiently complicated C
or Fortran program contains an ad hoc informally-specified bug-ridden
slow implementation of half of Common Lisp.
---------------------------------------------------------------------


From erik.enge at gmail.com  Mon Jan 15 13:34:35 2007
From: erik.enge at gmail.com (Erik Enge)
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2007 08:34:35 -0500
Subject: [flexichain-devel] Re: [admin] write privileges for group members
In-Reply-To: <17834.17041.471555.158934@serveur5.labri.fr>
References: <17834.17041.471555.158934@serveur5.labri.fr>
Message-ID: <58f839b70701150534x13ca21a1sbdda9895ca72acaf@mail.gmail.com>

Done.


From csr21 at cantab.net  Tue Jan 30 15:32:55 2007
From: csr21 at cantab.net (Christophe Rhodes)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 15:32:55 +0000
Subject: [flexichain-devel] .asd file
Message-ID: <87zm801qe0.fsf@cantab.net>

Hi,

The flexichain .asd file includes an almost-useless package: there are
no persistent definitions other than the system itself, so (since asdf
arranges for the file to be loaded in a temporary package which uses
the ASDF package) there's no need to define and use a -system package.
(Packages are surprisingly heavyweight objects, which is why I'm
drawing this to your attention).

There's one way in which having a package definition can be useful --
for incremental development of the .asd file itself.  However, you can
achieve that, if this is one of your goals, with an explicit asdf:
prefix to the defsystem symbol.

Cheers,

Christophe

[ PS: I'm not subscribed to this list, so Cc me if you want more
  discussion on this point. ]


From strandh at labri.fr  Tue Jan 30 16:38:04 2007
From: strandh at labri.fr (Robert Strandh)
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 17:38:04 +0100
Subject: [flexichain-devel] .asd file
In-Reply-To: <87zm801qe0.fsf@cantab.net>
References: <87zm801qe0.fsf@cantab.net>
Message-ID: <17855.29804.216281.313588@serveur5.labri.fr>

Christophe Rhodes writes:
 > 
 > The flexichain .asd file includes an almost-useless package: there are
 > no persistent definitions other than the system itself, so (since asdf
 > arranges for the file to be loaded in a temporary package which uses
 > the ASDF package) there's no need to define and use a -system package.
 > (Packages are surprisingly heavyweight objects, which is why I'm
 > drawing this to your attention).
 > 
 > There's one way in which having a package definition can be useful --
 > for incremental development of the .asd file itself.  However, you can
 > achieve that, if this is one of your goals, with an explicit asdf:
 > prefix to the defsystem symbol.

Done.  Thanks!

-- 
Robert Strandh

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Greenspun's Tenth Rule of Programming: any sufficiently complicated C
or Fortran program contains an ad hoc informally-specified bug-ridden
slow implementation of half of Common Lisp.
---------------------------------------------------------------------