From psykon at gmail.com  Sat Dec 11 18:48:39 2010
From: psykon at gmail.com (Daniel Oliveira)
Date: Sat, 11 Dec 2010 18:48:39 +0000
Subject: [flexi-streams-devel] UNREAD-BYTE and PEEK-BYTE on
	IN-MEMORY-INPUT-STREAM
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=TBo-7i7y+GU_7UgKOO=bS+ipyapMGgA_XZFc-@mail.gmail.com>

Hello, i'm using FLEXI-STREAMS and i have a problem, UNREAD-BYTE and
PEEK-BYTE aren't defined for IN-MEMORY-INPUT-STREAM's, is there a reason why
they can't be or why it doesn't make sense for them to be?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/flexi-streams-devel/attachments/20101211/2c5e5ec6/attachment.html>

From edi at weitz.de  Sun Dec 12 01:16:47 2010
From: edi at weitz.de (Edi Weitz)
Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2010 02:16:47 +0100
Subject: [flexi-streams-devel] UNREAD-BYTE and PEEK-BYTE on
	IN-MEMORY-INPUT-STREAM
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTi=TBo-7i7y+GU_7UgKOO=bS+ipyapMGgA_XZFc-@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTi=TBo-7i7y+GU_7UgKOO=bS+ipyapMGgA_XZFc-@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <AANLkTimG1ASn56Dth+LbVtKzZ3KbfbtjYe19_NcvaKJt@mail.gmail.com>

Hi Daniel,

As the documentation says, you can use in-memory streams as the
underlying streams for flexi streams.  If you do that, you'll have the
operations you wanted.

HTH,
Edi.


On Sat, Dec 11, 2010 at 7:48 PM, Daniel Oliveira <psykon at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello, i'm using FLEXI-STREAMS and i have a problem, UNREAD-BYTE and
> PEEK-BYTE aren't defined for IN-MEMORY-INPUT-STREAM's, is there a reason why
> they can't be or why it doesn't make sense for them to be?
> _______________________________________________
> flexi-streams-devel mailing list
> flexi-streams-devel at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/flexi-streams-devel
>
>