From ndl at ravenbrook.com  Mon Dec  7 08:19:24 2009
From: ndl at ravenbrook.com (Nick Levine)
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 08:19:24 GMT
Subject: [eclm] portable JFLI?
Message-ID: <200912070819.nB78JOcW071113@raven.ravenbrook.com>

Could the person who spoke to me so persuasively at the Hamburg ECLM
about porting the JFLI <http://jfli.sourceforge.net/> to run on CFFI
(as opposed to LW's proprietary FLI) please get in touch?

Thanks,

- nick



From antoniotti.marco at disco.unimib.it  Mon Dec  7 09:07:09 2009
From: antoniotti.marco at disco.unimib.it (Marco Antoniotti)
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 10:07:09 +0100
Subject: [eclm] portable JFLI?
In-Reply-To: <200912070819.nB78JOcW071113@raven.ravenbrook.com>
References: <200912070819.nB78JOcW071113@raven.ravenbrook.com>
Message-ID: <CE473ECC-268C-48C3-9AF7-896FED890781@disco.unimib.it>

You could also have a look at Foil, which should be "more portable" as  
it uses a socket interface.  They are all RH's children.

Cheers

Marco






On Dec 7, 2009, at 09:19 , Nick Levine wrote:

> Could the person who spoke to me so persuasively at the Hamburg ECLM
> about porting the JFLI <http://jfli.sourceforge.net/> to run on CFFI
> (as opposed to LW's proprietary FLI) please get in touch?
>
> Thanks,
>
> - nick
>
> _______________________________________________
> eclm mailing list
> eclm at common-lisp.net
> http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/eclm









From ndl at ravenbrook.com  Mon Dec  7 09:34:22 2009
From: ndl at ravenbrook.com (Nick Levine)
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 09:34:22 GMT
Subject: [eclm] portable JFLI?
In-Reply-To: <CE473ECC-268C-48C3-9AF7-896FED890781@disco.unimib.it> (message
	from Marco Antoniotti on Mon, 7 Dec 2009 10:07:09 +0100)
References: <200912070819.nB78JOcW071113@raven.ravenbrook.com>
	<CE473ECC-268C-48C3-9AF7-896FED890781@disco.unimib.it>
Message-ID: <200912070934.nB79YMiv073553@raven.ravenbrook.com>

   From: Marco Antoniotti <antoniotti.marco at disco.unimib.it>
   Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 10:07:09 +0100

   You could also have a look at Foil, which should be "more portable" as  
   it uses a socket interface.  They are all RH's children.

The conversation was about my intention to write about JFLI in one of
the later chapters in LOtB (I'm also devoting a chapter to Clojure and
intend to give Foil a mention). I have a JFLI application which I want
to include and porting it to Foil turns out not to be an option
(really, tried it, some time ago).

We agreed the chapter would be better if the example ran
"non-proprietary". It's just a small matter of programming...

- n