bug in (log)
Daniel Kochmański
daniel at turtleware.eu
Thu Nov 10 20:20:33 UTC 2022
Hey,
sorry for taking my time with the response. While indeed conforming, I've added a separate code path for ratios. I'm conditioning on the integer length (like SBCL does).
static cl_object
ecl_log1_ratio(cl_object x)
{
cl_object num = x->ratio.num;
cl_object den = x->ratio.den;
if (ecl_integer_length(num) != ecl_integer_length(den)) {
return ecl_minus(ecl_log1(num), ecl_log1(den));
} else {
return ecl_log1_fixnum(x);
}
}
Thanks all for the input. The change is now submitted as a merge request against develop (and will be part of the next release).
Best regards,
Daniel
--
Daniel Kochmański ;; aka jackdaniel | Przemyśl, Poland
TurtleWare - Daniel Kochmański | www.turtleware.eu
"Be the change that you wish to see in the world." - Mahatma Gandhi
------- Original Message -------
On Sunday, July 10th, 2022 at 5:39 PM, James Cloos <cloos at jhcloos.com> wrote:
> i should have realized this even before noticing ecl's limitation for
> logs of ratios, but at least i finally did....
>
> since i'monly using log to find the exponent for an arbitrary precision
> replacement for format's ~e, it works to truncate first.
>
> so i ended up with this:
>
> (defun ilog (n &optional (base nil base-p))
> "return floor of base b log of n"
> (let ((s (if (< n 1) -1 1))
> (trunc-n (truncate (if (< n 1) (/ n) n))))
> (floor (* s (if base-p
> (log trunc-n base)
> (log trunc-n))))))
>
>
> One could use let* and then test s when choosing between n and (/ n), but
> i choose instead to let the compiler optimize the two calls to (< n 1).
>
> that makes my ~e replacement work exactly as desired on all lisps i've tried.
>
> (I have a ~// function which chooses output baed on the arg's type, with
> ratios done via that print-e-significant-digits function and everything
> else using write.)
>
> -JimC
> --
> James Cloos cloos at jhcloos.com OpenPGP: 0x997A9F17ED7DAEA6
>
>
More information about the ecl-devel
mailing list