Where to go with EQL5 and QT specific questions?

[pls.153]

On Monday, March 1, 2021 1:54 PM, Renaud Casenave-Péré <renaud at casenave-pere.fr> wrote:
> I also welcome Paul to the sfos community and if you allow me I’ll
> continue maintaining eql5 package but if you’d rather taking it
> over just let me know.

Thanks, and yes please continue to maintain the eql5 package!

IMO it would be important to keep the current dynamic packages for developing, and eventually offer static packages (similar to the iOS port) for deployment only.

Paul