[Ecls-list] Better handling of printing errors

[Matthew Mondor]

On Sat, 19 Jan 2013 04:26:22 +0100
Peter Enerccio <enerccio at gmail.com> wrote:

> Also, I dont know if it is issue of slime/emacs, but methods shows really
> badly in stack traces, usually as <bytecompiled-function xxx>, so guess
> which method was
> called is somewhat detective work.

I wasn't aware of this but I have very little experience with CLOS
using ECL.  I know that a lot of work was done on CLOS performance and
ANSI conformance lately however, but I'm not sure if this issue is a
recent fallout of that...
-- 
Matt