[Ecls-list] ECL start and random numbers
Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll
juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com
Mon Jul 18 14:13:23 UTC 2011
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Philipp Marek <philipp at marek.priv.at>wrote:
> My reasoning is that most people don't need cryptographically secure 
> random numbers; if they need some, they can (and for portability _should_)
> always initialize the state themselves.
4 bytes for initializing MT seems too little to me. But is it really so
costly what ECL is currently doing?
Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ecl-devel