[Ecls-list] Another question
pbowyer at olynet.com
Sun Dec 18 21:37:58 UTC 2011
On 12/18/2011 12:12 PM, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 8:52 PM, Paul Bowyer <pbowyer at olynet.com
> <mailto:pbowyer at olynet.com>> wrote:
> I've just gotten a test copy of the 64-bit version of PCLinuxOS
> running on another computer and as part of checking it out, I
> have tried to set up ECL on it. Everything seems to have gone
> correctly and ECL installed apparently without problems, but when
> I ran the tests, I experienced more failures in the ansi.log file
> for the 64-bit install than I get with the 32-bit install that I
> have been using.
> Some of the ANSI tests are not very "correct" I would say. The tests
> check on the accuracy of certain functions, but what is accurate is
> something to be discussed. The differences between 32- and 64-bit
> platforms, or between operating systems in the same machine, are due
> to how the C library computes those mathematical functions. Some of
> them have enough accuracy for long-double types, some don't. Some work
> internally with double-float precision and have more accuracy than
> what the test suite expects. Some signal overflows, some don't. etc, etc.
> The other two tests
> are also probably due to the fact that the code uses internally double
> types for the products, exceeding the precision of the interpreted
> code. I also see them in my computer.
> Unless the
> Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
> c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain)
Thanks for easing my doubts. I assume the unfinished "Unless the" was
meant to convey that there is no reason to assume there are problems in
the 64-bit install that I need to worry about.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ecl-devel