[Ecls-list] Tighter c/c++ integration, toplevel inline c/c++ code ???

[Seth Burleigh]

>         
> 
> This is a limitation of the compiler and linker. The function "foo" is
> defined and loaded in memory, but we have not told the compiler about
> this function and second in some platforms it will be impossible to
> let the compile code use the "foo" function which is only in memory
> and not in a library. So the message is that this is not portable at
> all, but in some platforms it is possible. For instance, this is Mac
> OS X

How is one supposed to tell the compiler about the function, or in
general any class, class method, structure, etc?


Also, i recall reading somewhere that now fasl files are implemented as
linked libraries? So if you made a fasl file and loaded that?