[Ecls-list] Thread safety audit

[Raffael Cavallaro]

On Mar 9, 2010, at 8:47 PM, Matthew Mondor wrote:

> I also wanted to know what auto-synchronization
> expectations CL users might have.

I think the single most important thing is for it to be unambiguously documented which data types can be modified atomically. IOW, what can one call (setf some-place new-value) on without needing to wrap it in an mp:with-lock.

warmest regards,

Ralph


Raffael Cavallaro
raffaelcavallaro at me.com