[Ecls-list] About sockets - maybe last iteration?

[Tobias C. Rittweiler]

Matthew Mondor <mm_lists at pulsar-zone.net>
writes:

> On Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:54:13 +0100
> Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> I have revisited the SB-SOCKETS code and implemented the following changes.
> [...]
>
> Thanks for taking more time to work on this;  I just tested the changes
> now and the socket does close when the stream closes as expected.  The
> buffering being full by default is also nice, when I initially proposed
> this it wasn't done in the official source because slime assumed an
> unbuffered stream back then, if slime now also works with buffered
> streams this is also great to know.

How did this assumption manifest itself?

  -T.