[Ecls-list] compiling with mingw-w64

[Martin Rubey]

Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com> writes:

> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:57 PM, Martin Rubey <martin.rubey at math.uni-hannover.de> wrote:
>
>     Martin Rubey <martin.rubey at math.uni-hannover.de> writes:
>    
>     > Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <juanjose.garciaripoll at googlemail.com> writes:
>     >
>     >> On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 3:10 PM, Martin Rubey <
>     >> martin.rubey at math.uni-hannover.de> wrote:
>     >>
>     >>     I'm trying to (cross-compile) ecl for 64 bit on windows, but already
>     >>     configure fails.
>     >>
>     >> Sorry, I missed the cross-compile part.  I have fixed the autoconf file (src/
>     >> aclocal.m4) so that it adds some new options to the cross compilation file.
>     >> You will have to fill these options by hand. They were missing because we
>     >> forgot to check for cross compilation in these tests (ECL_LONG_LONG_BITS,
>     >> ECL_WORKING_SEM_INIT, etc)
>     >>
>     >> However note that I can not assure that cross compilation will work -- I did
>     >> not set up a cross compiler myself and these options are largely untested.
>     >
>     > OK, I just tried.  I'm now getting the following with a fresh cvs
>     > checkout.  But I have no idea which file to edit, and what to write into
>     > it...
>    
>     I just reran configure a second time, which (sort of) finished without
>     error (to my surprise), and ran make.  gmp (4.3.2 + patch by Ozkan, not
>     the one shipped with ecl!!!) seems to have built correctly, however I
>     get the following, which seems to be due to the fact that I didn't
>     supply the right values for the variables you mentioned...
>
> The first phase creates a dummy configuration file at the place where
> you configured ECL and aborts. As the instructions explain (though the
> file name is missing) you have to edit that file and reconfigure and
> build.

Could you give me some hints on what values to fill in?  Or where I
could get such hints?

Thanks,

Martin