[Ecls-list] ECL + ContextL?

[Waldek Hebisch]

Alexander Gavrilov wrote:
> 
> How is it going to affect ffi:c-inline? Currently ECL seems to be the
> only implementation where it is reasonably possible to use SSE
> instructions, by means of generating inline C code fragments
> with SSE intrinsics via compiler macros.
> 

Closure CL allows functions written in Lispy assembler.  I am
not sure if you consider this reasonable (I did not check,
but I think you can generate Lispy assembler from macros).

-- 
                              Waldek Hebisch
hebisch at math.uni.wroc.pl