[Ecls-list] Order of functions

[Matthew Mondor]

On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 18:49:42 -0400
Matthew Mondor <mm_lists at pulsar-zone.net> wrote:

> I am seeing a problem where ECL (9.8.1) works fine with particular code
> (even when the file is compiled) but where the standalone executable
> doesn't.  It seems to be related to the order of function definitions.

This can be disreguarded, it turned out that there was a bug and SBCL
was also failing with the same code.  It was an ordering issue, but not
specifically related to ECL.  Sorry for the noise.
-- 
Matt