[Ecls-list] Order of functions
mm_lists at pulsar-zone.net
Wed Aug 12 02:29:58 UTC 2009
On Sun, 9 Aug 2009 18:49:42 -0400
Matthew Mondor <mm_lists at pulsar-zone.net> wrote:
> I am seeing a problem where ECL (9.8.1) works fine with particular code
> (even when the file is compiled) but where the standalone executable
> doesn't. It seems to be related to the order of function definitions.
This can be disreguarded, it turned out that there was a bug and SBCL
was also failing with the same code. It was an ordering issue, but not
specifically related to ECL. Sorry for the noise.
More information about the ecl-devel