[Ecls-list] *read-suppress* REPL reader "bug"
dherring at tentpost.com
Sun Dec 14 01:10:38 UTC 2008
Bug in quotes since it appears to be entirely conforming and common, and
it falls into the "rm -rf /" or "deltree c:" class of stupid.
If at the REPL you type (setf *read-suppress* t),
SBCL: useless REPL
ECL: useless REPL
CCL: useless REPL
I couldn't get "useless REPLs" to return anything other than nil.
While dpANS/CLHS don't seem to say anything about this, I believe CLISP
has the right idea. The REPL should (lexically) ensure *read-suppress* is
bound to nil before reading user input.
P.S. I BCC'd this message to sbcl-devel, ecls-list, and openmcl-devel to
avoid automatic cross-posting of replies. Other implementations may also
More information about the ecl-devel