[Ecls-list] Patch: Athlon 64s weren't getting :DFFI and FP exception detection

Donavon Keithley keithley at easystreet.com
Wed Jan 10 23:35:17 UTC 2007


On Wednesday 10 January 2007 14:48, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
> But then your previous patch is incorrect: when uname -m returns
> x86_64 you are instructing ECL to use the assembly code for DFFI in 32
> bit mode!!!

Right, my patch clearly isn't the answer.

All I'm saying is that if the configure script needs to distinguish between 
32-bit and 64-bit *architectures* (not CPUs), then 'uname -m' appears to be 
suitable.  On my system it correctly indicates a 32-bit architecture, despite 
the 64-bit CPU.

Donavon




More information about the ecl-devel mailing list