[Ecls-list] Patch: Athlon 64s weren't getting :DFFI and FP exception detection
Donavon Keithley
keithley at easystreet.com
Wed Jan 10 17:50:01 UTC 2007
I looked into this a bit. On a system like mine, 'uname -m' returns "i686"
whereas under a 64-bit personality it would report "x86_64".
Lots of good info here:
http://gcc.fyxm.net/summit/2003/Porting%20to%2064%20bit.pdf
Donavon
On Wednesday 10 January 2007 06:36, Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll wrote:
> 2007/1/10, Donavon Keithley <keithley at easystreet.com>:
> > Sorry, to clarify, I'm running a 32-bit Linux distro on an Athlon 64. So
> > while my host_cpu is "x86_64", I'm building elf32 binaries.
>
> Hmm, then one should definitely find out what flags a 64 bit operating
> system adds to the output of "uname". Otherwise we are going to run
> into trouble when I commit the patch for 64bits DFFI this weekend.
>
> Juanjo
>
> --
> Dpto. de Fisica Teorica I, Fac. de CC Fisicas, Universidad Complutense,
> Ciudad Universitaria s/n Madrid 2804 (Spain)
> http://teorica.fis.ucm.es/~jjgarcia/
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
> Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to share
> your opinions on IT & business topics through brief surveys - and earn cash
> http://www.techsay.com/default.php?page=join.php&p=sourceforge&CID=DEVDEV
> _______________________________________________
> Ecls-list mailing list
> Ecls-list at lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
More information about the ecl-devel
mailing list