[closer-devel] Re: [Ecls-list] Closer to MOP for ecl

Gary King gwking at metabang.com
Thu May 11 12:22:03 UTC 2006


On May 11, 2006, at 2:43 PM, Pascal Costanza wrote:

> ...but I just realized that this wouldn't buy you much, because  
> (type object 'eql-specializer) already works across all CL  
> implementations.
>
> So what do you want? ;)

Ah, good point. I think I'll just convert my eql-specializer-p into a  
defun and go with that as a handy (?) abbreviation.

thanks,
-- 
Gary Warren King
metabang.com
http://www.metabang.com/
(413) 210 7511
gwking on #lisp (occasionally)






More information about the ecl-devel mailing list