[Ecls-list] Re: RANDOM on a positive bignum always returns zero

[Juan Jose Garcia Ripoll]

Paul F. Dietz wrote:

> This is different from what I'm seeing (ecl built from
> cvs head, with cmuformat).  However, I notice that this
> gives 0.9d, not e.
> What branch should I update to if cvs head is not the most
> current?

Sorry, it was not a problem of branches, but of ANNOUNCEMENT and 
src/configure* not being committed into the SourceForge cvs tree. To 
make sure things are all right, I did a fresh checkout of ecls (a "cvs 
update -C -A -P" should equally work) and rebuilt it from scratch. The 
random number generator still works with bignums as shown before.

Juanjo