[Fwd: Re: [Ecls-list] Not that bad...]

[lisp]

"Julian Stecklina" <der_julian at web.de> writes:
> Have you some information on how the other CLs "score"? But sounds >
nice, nonetheless. :)

Well, with the changes to be committed on Monday, things get significantly
better (See below).  The only serious errors left are the ones related to
DEFGENERIC, CALL-NEXT-METHOD and FORMAT.

31 out of 19668 total tests failed: COMMON-LISP-PACKAGE-NICKNAMES,
COMMON-LISP-USER-PACKAGE-NICKNAMES,
   DOLIST.11, DOTIMES.8, DEFGENERIC.ERROR.20, DEFGENERIC.ERROR.21,
   DEFGENERIC.4, CALL-NEXT-METHOD.ERROR.1, CALL-NEXT-METHOD.ERROR.2,
   UPGRADED-ARRAY-ELEMENT-TYPE.8, UPGRADED-ARRAY-ELEMENT-TYPE.NIL.1,
   MAP.ERROR.11,
   ALL-STANDARD-GENERIC-FUNCTIONS-ARE-INSTANCES-OF-THAT-CLASS,
   DEFTYPE.6, STRING-IS-NOT-VECTOR-OF-CHARACTER.1,
   STRING-IS-NOT-VECTOR-OF-CHARACTER.3,
   STRING-IS-NOT-VECTOR-OF-CHARACTER.5,
   SIMPLE-STRING-IS-NOT-SIMPLE-1D-ARRAY-OF-CHARACTER.1,
   SIMPLE-STRING-IS-NOT-SIMPLE-1D-ARRAY-OF-CHARACTER.3,
   SIMPLE-STRING-IS-NOT-SIMPLE-1D-ARRAY-OF-CHARACTER.5, TYPE-OF.1,
   BASE-STRING.5, BASE-STRING.6, SIMPLE-STRING.8, SIMPLE-STRING.9,
   SIMPLE-STRING.10, SIMPLE-BASE-STRING.9, SIMPLE-BASE-STRING.10,
   SIMPLE-BASE-STRING.11, MAKE-STRING-OUTPUT-STREAM.12,
   FORMAT.LOGICAL-BLOCK.23.