[Ecls-list] si::c-uint-max & si::c-ulong-max

[Juan Jose Garcia Ripoll]

Hundo wrote:

>By the way, do you also get the behavior I reported in
>my other message with evaluating '+nand causing a "Not
>a number" error message? I'm seeing it on a couple of
>different machines so I suspect it's not a local
>problem or perhaps there's something I'm missing.
>  
>
Yes, I noticed this. To save memory and avoid duplicated code, ECL uses 
the C library for parsing numbers and it seems some libraries accept 
"nan" as a valid floating point number :-) I am looking for a workaround.

Juanjo