[Ecls-list] Announcement: RDNZL - a .NET bridge for CL
edi at agharta.de
Thu Dec 16 02:48:00 UTC 2004
On Thu, 16 Dec 2004 11:10:11 +0100, "Goffioul Michael" <goffioul at imec.be> wrote:
> I had a look at the code, but it doesn't seem to use UFFI. You
> should definitively try to port your code to UFFI to get a broader
> LISP implementation support.
Nope. I don't use UFFI for a reason:
1. The current version of RDNZL doesn't depend on any external
libraries at all.
2. With UFFI you'll need at least another one (ASDF) and you'll add
lots of code that RDNZL doesn't need. This is all stuff you want
to get rid of if you deliver an executable.
3. Also, both libraries are Unix-centric and don't work smoothly with
4. While UFFI adds a lot of things RDNZL doesn't need it is missing
callbacks which /are/ needed by RDNZL.
5. Even if I used UFFI (and someone had implemented the callback
support) there were still other implementation-specific things
you'd need to add: GC finalization hooks, exit hooks or an advice
facility, direct GC calls.
Having said that, porting RDNZL to another Lisp shouldn't be hard if
you're familiar with your implementation: You'll have to find the
right translations for about ten functions/macros in port-xx.lisp and
at least half of them should be trivial.
More information about the ecl-devel