From edi at agharta.de Mon Oct 1 08:08:46 2007 From: edi at agharta.de (Edi Weitz) Date: Mon, 01 Oct 2007 10:08:46 +0200 Subject: [drakma-announce] New release 0.11.0 (Was: Drakma and content-type) In-Reply-To: <5aea26870709301426h406f328cx98eb845d1788fbc9@mail.gmail.com> (Peter Eddy's message of "Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:26:33 -0400") References: <5aea26870709301426h406f328cx98eb845d1788fbc9@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Sun, 30 Sep 2007 17:26:33 -0400, "Peter Eddy" wrote: > I've spent some time today converting some code (cl-s3) to use > drakma instead of s-http-client. In the process, one thing I thought > might be useful in drakma is a caller-defined way of indicating that > the content type is text or not. For example, a function like the > following passed to (http-request) > > (defun text-content-type-p (type subtype) ..) > > Or perhaps some table of text content types defined as a special > var. I know the caller could implement this themselves, but it seems > like doing so might require the re-implementation of portions of > http-request that deal with the charset and chunked incoding > (i.e. the code within (when (and (string-equal type "text"). > > Do you think this makes sense, or am I'm missing something? [Please use the mailing list to discuss Drakma.] Yes, that sounds like a reasonable request and I was planning to add something like that anyway. Please check if the new release provides what you need. Cheers, Edi. From edi at agharta.de Thu Oct 11 08:50:59 2007 From: edi at agharta.de (Edi Weitz) Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 10:50:59 +0200 Subject: [drakma-announce] New release 0.11.1 (Was: New releases 0.10.3 (Drakma) and 0.4.1 (Chunga)) In-Reply-To: <7c23adaa0710110143s67825b94he6d9268a524a124d@mail.gmail.com> (Ivan Toshkov's message of "Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:43:10 +0300") References: <278250439.53301191303854664.JavaMail.root@mail-101.colo.sourcelabs.com> <7c23adaa0710110143s67825b94he6d9268a524a124d@mail.gmail.com> Message-ID: On Thu, 11 Oct 2007 11:43:10 +0300, "Ivan Toshkov" wrote: > Hmm, it's strange, because you've released drakma 0.11.0 on 1 > October. Yes, sorry, S?bastien Saint-Sevin also just emailed me about this. I switched laptops recently and it seems I released 0.11.0 from the old one after I had already copied my repository to the new machine. Should be fixed now, i.e. 0.11.1 is online which includes the additions from both 0.11.0 and "0.10.3". Thanks to you both, Edi.