From edi at agharta.de  Mon Jun 25 10:29:54 2007
From: edi at agharta.de (Edi Weitz)
Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2007 12:29:54 +0200
Subject: [drakma-announce] New version 0.8.0 (Was: Two problems with cookies
 expiry dates format)
In-Reply-To: <muxodjb7jet.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr> (Didier Verna's message of
	"Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:56:26 +0200")
References: <muxodjb7jet.fsf@uzeb.lrde.epita.fr>
Message-ID: <uy7i8nx7h.fsf@agharta.de>

On Tue, 19 Jun 2007 22:56:26 +0200, Didier Verna <didier at lrde.epita.fr> wrote:

> I've run into 2 formats that parse-cookie-date can't currently handle:
>
> - the first one looks like this: "Sun, 18 Jun 2006 04:01:09
>   GMT-07:00" I presume it means GMT minus 7 hours.
>
> - the second one is almost one of the recognized formats, except
>   that it says PDT (Pacific Daylight Time AFAIK) instead of GMT.
>
> Note that I have no idea if these formats are standard or not. I
> just ran into them...

The latest release 0.8.0 should hopefully be able to parse these dates
correctly.  Note that I've also added a special variable so you can
allow Drakma to fail when parsing cookie dates.  Still, I'd prefer if
people would report any date format Drakma can't parse to this mailing
list.

Thanks for the report,
Edi.


From edi at agharta.de  Fri Jun 29 23:22:29 2007
From: edi at agharta.de (Edi Weitz)
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2007 01:22:29 +0200
Subject: [drakma-announce] New release 0.9.0 (Was: Status text from request
	(re-post))
In-Reply-To: <eb09f3220706271317h15302ae6r6c70bb7136b31bee@mail.gmail.com> (H.
	Duerer's message of "Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:17:23 +0100")
References: <eb09f3220706271317h15302ae6r6c70bb7136b31bee@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ur6nufiru.fsf@agharta.de>

On Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:17:23 +0100, "H Duerer" <h.duerer at gmail.com> wrote:

> sorry about that first email -- I am still learning gmail and hadn't
> realised I was rudely sending HTML.

The first email was multipart/alternative which is fine, at least for
Gnus users like me.  The problem with the second email was that Gmail
inserted gratuitous line breaks which rendered the (inlined) diff
unusable.

Anyway, thanks for the patch, it's in 0.9.0.  The next time you send a
patch, please make sure to update the HTML documentation as well.

  http://weitz.de/patches.html

Cheers,
Edi.