[cxml-devel] patch - xml-name-rune-p - proposing an approach w/o #.

Nathan Bird nathan at acceleration.net
Thu Aug 17 16:45:12 UTC 2006


I took a stab at the same bit of code a little while back trying to
merge characters.lisp and xml-name-rune-p.lisp and came up with some (I
thought) cleaner code that compiled quite a bit faster than what was there.
If you want to compare:
http://common-lisp.net/pipermail/cxml-devel/2006-June/000051.html. From
quickly skimming your patch it looks pretty similar :-)

Nathan Bird

Sean Champ wrote:
> Attached to ths email is the final, corrected version of the patch. I had been
> using OR where AND is required.
>
>
> On 08-16-06, David Lichteblau wrote:
>   
>> Quoting Sean Champ (gimmal at gmail.com):
>>     
>>> I was compiling CXML, in SBCL 0.9.15. I noticed that the compiler kept
>>> "getting stuck", when compiling the file xml-name-rune-p. Upon looking at the
>>>       
>> Give it time.  It will finish eventually.
>>     
>
> Obviosly, it is your projects' codebase. I'd like to voice the
> assertion, however: It compiles quite quickly, with this patched code.
>
>   
>>> file, it appeared that the 'getting stuck' behavior may have had something to
>>> do with the #. form in the file.
>>>       
>> You are probably compiling with a high DEBUG setting, causing SBCL to
>> enable step-instrumentation.  Solution: Use a lower DEBUG setting.
>>     
>
> Inded, I am compiling with a high debug quality -- (debug 3) -- but I have
> disabled the insertion of step conditions -- (sb-c:insert-step-conditions 0)
> in the compiler policy.
>
>
>
> --
> Sean Champ
>   
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------




More information about the cxml-devel mailing list