From kamils80 at gmail.com Mon Oct 15 08:47:16 2012 From: kamils80 at gmail.com (Kamil Shakirov) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 15:47:16 +0700 Subject: [clx-devel] CLX-PORTABLE port to LispWorks 6.x Message-ID: Hello, Is anyone interested in the port to LispWorks 6.x? It is based on works (OPEN-UNIX-STREAM) by Barry Wilkes and (%CREATE-UNIX-DOMAIN-SOCKET) by Chun Tian (binghe). It tested with LispWorks Professional and Personal editions. I also have a port of StumpWM to LW running for a week on my laptop without any issues. Pull request is already sent to https://github.com/sharplispers/clx or you can fetch the latest port form https://github.com/ska80/clx (lispworks branch). -- --ska From ndj at bitart.cc Mon Oct 15 08:55:45 2012 From: ndj at bitart.cc (Nico de Jager) Date: Mon, 15 Oct 2012 10:55:45 +0200 Subject: [clx-devel] CLX-PORTABLE port to LispWorks 6.x In-Reply-To: (Kamil Shakirov's message of "Mon, 15 Oct 2012 15:47:16 +0700") References: Message-ID: <87vcecru5q.fsf@bitart.cc> Kamil Shakirov writes: > Hello, > > Is anyone interested in the port to LispWorks 6.x? It is based on > works (OPEN-UNIX-STREAM) by Barry Wilkes and > (%CREATE-UNIX-DOMAIN-SOCKET) by Chun Tian (binghe). > > It tested with LispWorks Professional and Personal editions. I also > have a port of StumpWM to LW running for a week on my laptop without > any issues. > > Pull request is already sent to https://github.com/sharplispers/clx or > you can fetch the latest port form https://github.com/ska80/clx > (lispworks branch). Excellent! I was looking for exactly this, both CLX and StumpWM on LispWorks. Will this be integrated with the main branches of these two projects? Thanks. Nico From kamils80 at gmail.com Wed Oct 17 04:46:26 2012 From: kamils80 at gmail.com (Kamil Shakirov) Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2012 11:46:26 +0700 Subject: [clx-devel] CLX-PORTABLE port to LispWorks 6.x In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, I have just sent a new pull request (8573aaf) to https://github.com/sharplispers/clx as a single patch with all unrelated formatting changes removed. Please ignore the previous request. Shawn, the StumpWM creator and maintainer, has already accepted the patch that adds support for LispWorks 6 to StumpWM. On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 3:47 PM, Kamil Shakirov wrote: > Hello, > > Is anyone interested in the port to LispWorks 6.x? It is based on > works (OPEN-UNIX-STREAM) by Barry Wilkes and > (%CREATE-UNIX-DOMAIN-SOCKET) by Chun Tian (binghe). > > It tested with LispWorks Professional and Personal editions. I also > have a port of StumpWM to LW running for a week on my laptop without > any issues. > > Pull request is already sent to https://github.com/sharplispers/clx or > you can fetch the latest port form https://github.com/ska80/clx > (lispworks branch). > -- --ska From kamils80 at gmail.com Wed Oct 24 03:10:14 2012 From: kamils80 at gmail.com (Kamil Shakirov) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 10:10:14 +0700 Subject: [clx-devel] CLX-PORTABLE port to LispWorks 6.x In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi, Do maintainers read this list? Who is in charge? Could you please respond. :) On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Kamil Shakirov wrote: > Hi, > > I have just sent a new pull request (8573aaf) to > https://github.com/sharplispers/clx as a single patch with all > unrelated formatting changes removed. Please ignore the previous > request. > > Shawn, the StumpWM creator and maintainer, has already accepted the > patch that adds support for LispWorks 6 to StumpWM. > -- --ska From vsedach at gmail.com Thu Oct 25 01:27:08 2012 From: vsedach at gmail.com (Vladimir Sedach) Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 18:27:08 -0700 Subject: [clx-devel] CLX-PORTABLE port to LispWorks 6.x In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: The sharplispers/clx branch is owned by Cyrus Harmon . Chirstophe Rhodes told me that Zach Beane is supposed to be involved too. Ben Spencer who works on StumpWM has a CLX branch (http://gitorious.org/clx) and had some interest in developing CLX more. I don't think Cyrus Harmon has the time to really work on it, and I don't know if he's even on this list. Vladimir On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Kamil Shakirov wrote: > Hi, > > Do maintainers read this list? Who is in charge? Could you please respond. :) > > On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Kamil Shakirov wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have just sent a new pull request (8573aaf) to >> https://github.com/sharplispers/clx as a single patch with all >> unrelated formatting changes removed. Please ignore the previous >> request. >> >> Shawn, the StumpWM creator and maintainer, has already accepted the >> patch that adds support for LispWorks 6 to StumpWM. >> > > -- > --ska > > _______________________________________________ > clx-devel mailing list > clx-devel at common-lisp.net > http://lists.common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clx-devel From kamils80 at gmail.com Thu Oct 25 03:20:40 2012 From: kamils80 at gmail.com (Kamil Shakirov) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 10:20:40 +0700 Subject: [clx-devel] CLX-PORTABLE port to LispWorks 6.x In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Hi Vladimir, Thanks for the info. On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Vladimir Sedach wrote: > The sharplispers/clx branch is owned by Cyrus Harmon > . Chirstophe Rhodes told me that Zach Beane is > supposed to be involved too. The main reason I used that branch is because it is official and used by Quicklisp. > Ben Spencer who works on StumpWM has a CLX > branch (http://gitorious.org/clx) and had some interest in developing > CLX more. I checked Ben's master branch and it is a bit behind (some minor changes) the official one. > I don't think Cyrus Harmon has the time to really work on > it, and I don't know if he's even on this list. If Ben's branch becomes official I can send him my patches but someone needs to make it official. > Vladimir > > On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Kamil Shakirov wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Do maintainers read this list? Who is in charge? Could you please respond. :) >> >> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Kamil Shakirov wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have just sent a new pull request (8573aaf) to >>> https://github.com/sharplispers/clx as a single patch with all >>> unrelated formatting changes removed. Please ignore the previous >>> request. >>> >>> Shawn, the StumpWM creator and maintainer, has already accepted the >>> patch that adds support for LispWorks 6 to StumpWM. >>> -- --ska From vsedach at gmail.com Thu Oct 25 04:27:50 2012 From: vsedach at gmail.com (Vladimir Sedach) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 00:27:50 -0400 Subject: [clx-devel] CLX-PORTABLE port to LispWorks 6.x In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Yes. I think the situation is that nobody wants to be the CLX maintainer. I think the best bet is to ask Cyrus for commit access to sharplispers/clx and just do whatever you need. On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Kamil Shakirov wrote: > Hi Vladimir, > > Thanks for the info. > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Vladimir Sedach wrote: >> The sharplispers/clx branch is owned by Cyrus Harmon >> . Chirstophe Rhodes told me that Zach Beane is >> supposed to be involved too. > > The main reason I used that branch is because it is official and used > by Quicklisp. > >> Ben Spencer who works on StumpWM has a CLX >> branch (http://gitorious.org/clx) and had some interest in developing >> CLX more. > > I checked Ben's master branch and it is a bit behind (some minor > changes) the official one. > >> I don't think Cyrus Harmon has the time to really work on >> it, and I don't know if he's even on this list. > > If Ben's branch becomes official I can send him my patches but someone > needs to make it official. > >> Vladimir >> >> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Kamil Shakirov wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> Do maintainers read this list? Who is in charge? Could you please respond. :) >>> >>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Kamil Shakirov wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> I have just sent a new pull request (8573aaf) to >>>> https://github.com/sharplispers/clx as a single patch with all >>>> unrelated formatting changes removed. Please ignore the previous >>>> request. >>>> >>>> Shawn, the StumpWM creator and maintainer, has already accepted the >>>> patch that adds support for LispWorks 6 to StumpWM. >>>> > > -- > --ska From kamils80 at gmail.com Thu Oct 25 04:52:49 2012 From: kamils80 at gmail.com (Kamil Shakirov) Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 11:52:49 +0700 Subject: [clx-devel] CLX-PORTABLE port to LispWorks 6.x In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Vladimir Sedach wrote: > Yes. I think the situation is that nobody wants to be the CLX > maintainer. I think the best bet is to ask Cyrus for commit access to > sharplispers/clx and just do whatever you need. Ok, I will try to contact Cyrus and see what we can do. > > On Wed, Oct 24, 2012 at 11:20 PM, Kamil Shakirov wrote: >> Hi Vladimir, >> >> Thanks for the info. >> >> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Vladimir Sedach wrote: >>> The sharplispers/clx branch is owned by Cyrus Harmon >>> . Chirstophe Rhodes told me that Zach Beane is >>> supposed to be involved too. >> >> The main reason I used that branch is because it is official and used >> by Quicklisp. >> >>> Ben Spencer who works on StumpWM has a CLX >>> branch (http://gitorious.org/clx) and had some interest in developing >>> CLX more. >> >> I checked Ben's master branch and it is a bit behind (some minor >> changes) the official one. >> >>> I don't think Cyrus Harmon has the time to really work on >>> it, and I don't know if he's even on this list. >> >> If Ben's branch becomes official I can send him my patches but someone >> needs to make it official. >> >>> Vladimir >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Kamil Shakirov wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Do maintainers read this list? Who is in charge? Could you please respond. :) >>>> >>>> On Wed, Oct 17, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Kamil Shakirov wrote: >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> I have just sent a new pull request (8573aaf) to >>>>> https://github.com/sharplispers/clx as a single patch with all >>>>> unrelated formatting changes removed. Please ignore the previous >>>>> request. >>>>> >>>>> Shawn, the StumpWM creator and maintainer, has already accepted the >>>>> patch that adds support for LispWorks 6 to StumpWM. >>>>> -- --ska