[cltl3-devel] RFC: CLtL3 Charter

[Malcolm Reynolds]

> If you think that implementors are going to go ahead and code to
> anything we can come up with, you are barking up the wrong tree.
> However, if we define a minimal set of features as 'CLtL3', and
> provide a reference implementation, there is a chance that it might
> gain hold, and users might demand CLtL3 compliance from vendors.
>
>

Slightly off topic, but if I might enquire.. when you say provide
provide a reference implementation, does that mean picking one of the
open source CL implementations and developing it to include everything
that CLtL3 specifies?

Malcolm