[cltl3-devel] Fwd: RFC: CLtL3 Charter

[Gustavo]

2009/9/1 <drew.crampsie at gmail.com>

>
> I'd personally much prefer a 'lispy' (read : verbose and understandable)
> implementation of regexps then the one from perl, and still wouldn't want it
> included as part of CLtL3..
>

cl-ppcre allow the use of sexps as regexps. I think that they are "verbose"
and "understandable".
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/cltl3-devel/attachments/20090901/b6272d96/attachment.html>