[cltl3-devel] RFC: CLtL3 Charter

[Luís Oliveira]

On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:47 AM, Gustavo<gugamilare at gmail.com> wrote:
> I know, but I didn't like the approach of that CDR. I think that the
> standard functions gethash, make-hash-table, etc, should work for generic
> hashtables, no new packages should be needed. It also should specify how the
> type (or class) GENERIC-HASH-TABLE should be related to the system class
> HASH-TABLE (Is it a subtype? A proper subtype? Or a disjoint type?)

Indeed, the approach followed by Christophe Rhodes in his extensible
sequences paper is much more appropriate.

-- 
Luís Oliveira
http://student.dei.uc.pt/~lmoliv/