[closer-devel] Closer-mop support for ABCL
Rudolf Schlatte
rudi at constantly.at
Sun Aug 26 19:26:13 UTC 2012
On Aug 26, 2012, at 19:17, Pascal Costanza <pc at p-cos.net> wrote:
> OK, class redefinition doesn't trigger the obsolete instance structure protocol correctly, it seems. Here is a transcript:
>
> CL-USER(1): (defclass person () (name))
> #<STANDARD-CLASS PERSON {1E631646}>
> CL-USER(2): (defparameter *p* (make-instance 'person))
> *P*
> CL-USER(3): (setf (slot-value *p* 'name) "name")
> "name"
> CL-USER(4): (defclass person () (name address))
> #<STANDARD-CLASS PERSON {1E631646}>
> CL-USER(5): (use-package :mop)
> T
> CL-USER(6): (class-slots (find-class 'person))
> (#<SYSTEM:SLOT-DEFINITION NAME {1A60232C}> #<SYSTEM:SLOT-DEFINITION ADDRESS {37A0B39B}>)
> CL-USER(7): (setf (slot-value-using-class (find-class 'person) *p* (second *)) "address")
> #<THREAD "interpreter" {43F31EDC}>: Debugger invoked on condition of type TYPE-ERROR
> The value 1 is not of type (INTEGER 0 1).
> Restarts:
> 0: TOP-LEVEL Return to top level.
>
> The problematic part seems to be the use of slot-value-using-class here. With just slot-value, this works fine...
(set-)standard-instance-access didn't check for invalid object layout, fixed in r14137. Pure slot-value goes through a different code path for classes with metaclass standard-class, which did the check and update already.
Thanks for reporting!
Rudi
More information about the closer-devel
mailing list