[closer-devel] LAYER-NAME vs LAYER in ADJOIN-LAYER/REMOVE-LAYER.
Drew Crampsie
drewc at tech.coop
Wed Jun 24 16:06:30 UTC 2009
Hello,
I'm sure i'm abusing contextl in some way (anonymous layers that
themselves are layered classes), but for my code to work the call to
ADJOIN-LAYER in REMOVE-LAYER-USING-CLASS must pass the layer directly
to ADJOIN-LAYER, not indirect through the layer name.
In other words :
hunk ./cx-layer.lisp 103
- (layer-name active-layer)
+ active-layer
This works for me and passes all the tests, but i'm not sure if it's
the right thing to do... i'm likely abusing contextl in many ways ;).
Cheers,
drewc
More information about the closer-devel
mailing list