[closer-devel] LAYER-NAME vs LAYER in ADJOIN-LAYER/REMOVE-LAYER.

Drew Crampsie drewc at tech.coop
Wed Jun 24 16:06:30 UTC 2009


Hello,

I'm sure i'm abusing contextl in some way (anonymous layers that
themselves are layered classes), but for my code to work the call to
ADJOIN-LAYER in REMOVE-LAYER-USING-CLASS must pass the layer directly
to ADJOIN-LAYER, not indirect through the layer name.

In other words :

hunk ./cx-layer.lisp 103
-                                (layer-name active-layer)
+                                active-layer

This works for me and passes all the tests, but i'm not sure if it's
the right thing to do... i'm likely abusing contextl in many ways ;).

Cheers,

drewc




More information about the closer-devel mailing list