From attila.lendvai at gmail.com Thu Jun 4 11:11:11 2009 From: attila.lendvai at gmail.com (Attila Lendvai) Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 13:11:11 +0200 Subject: [closer-devel] contextl fix Message-ID: Pascal, darcs pull http://common-lisp.net/project/cl-dwim/darcs/contextl/ as far as i can see there was a missing dependency in the .asd as reported by a cl-perec user. i couldn't reproduce it, but asdf has this annoying habit of using file-system order unless the dependencies specify otherwise... -- attila From drewc at tech.coop Wed Jun 24 16:06:30 2009 From: drewc at tech.coop (Drew Crampsie) Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 09:06:30 -0700 Subject: [closer-devel] LAYER-NAME vs LAYER in ADJOIN-LAYER/REMOVE-LAYER. Message-ID: Hello, I'm sure i'm abusing contextl in some way (anonymous layers that themselves are layered classes), but for my code to work the call to ADJOIN-LAYER in REMOVE-LAYER-USING-CLASS must pass the layer directly to ADJOIN-LAYER, not indirect through the layer name. In other words : hunk ./cx-layer.lisp 103 - (layer-name active-layer) + active-layer This works for me and passes all the tests, but i'm not sure if it's the right thing to do... i'm likely abusing contextl in many ways ;). Cheers, drewc