<div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div dir="ltr"><div class="gmail_default" style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small"><br></div><br><div class="gmail_quote"><div dir="ltr">On Thu, Oct 11, 2018 at 4:32 AM Daniel Kochmański <<a href="mailto:daniel@turtleware.eu">daniel@turtleware.eu</a>> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">Hey,<br>
<br>
new website is great. There are though a few suprises:<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small" class="gmail_default">Yes, the new site looks really nice.</div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small" class="gmail_default"><br></div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small" class="gmail_default">I think the latest news section should have common-lisp news first. (I couldn't care less about what reddit has to say, but maybe that's just me.)<br></div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small" class="gmail_default"><br></div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small" class="gmail_default">The getting started page could be a bit more inclusive (or less exclusive).<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<br>
- clisp and lispworks are not listed in Resources -> Common Lisp<br>
Implementations<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small" class="gmail_default">There are others missing like cmucl and gcl. What is the criteria here?</div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small" class="gmail_default"><br></div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small" class="gmail_default">I think the order of the resources pull down should have lisp implementations first.</div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small" class="gmail_default"><br></div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small" class="gmail_default">Resources->Libraries includes a section on implementations. That seems wrong. (Also, what is the criteria for having a link o stand compliance or conformance?)</div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small" class="gmail_default"><br></div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small" class="gmail_default">I also random clicked on some of the projects. Quite a few are just place holders. In those cases, could they just be redirected to the git repo? It just makes the project look totally dead.</div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small" class="gmail_default"><br></div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small" class="gmail_default">I would be kind of neat if the project pages that happen to be hosted on <a href="http://common-lisp.net">common-lisp.net</a> use a uniform style. That would make the sites look really nice. (Cmucl just redirects to it's wiki page, which is better than nothing.)</div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small" class="gmail_default"><br></div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small" class="gmail_default">The project hosting page (<a href="https://common-lisp.net/project-intro">https://common-lisp.net/project-intro</a>) mentions CVS access in the Table of Contents. That's all gone. Similarly, the "Repositories over the web" section mentions cvs and subversion, as the "Subversion" section. Also, the section on git repos mentions the commit list is <a href="mailto:project-cvs@common-lisp.net">project-cvs@common-lisp.net</a>. Is that true? Finally, IIRC, Trac is still available, but really rather limited, maybe even mostly read-only. (Maybe also need to update <a href="https://common-lisp.net/tools#trac">https://common-lisp.net/tools#trac</a>.) Maybe there needs to be a mention somewhere (I didn't find any) that <a href="http://c-l.net">c-l.net</a> is using gitlab. (BTW, is there a way to find out what version of gitlab is being used?)</div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small" class="gmail_default"><br></div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small" class="gmail_default">These are just some things I noticed when looking over this new site for the first time. Many of these are probably issues with the old site, so it's kind of expected the new one has the same issues.</div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small" class="gmail_default"><br></div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small" class="gmail_default">It looks really great, though!<br></div><div style="font-family:arial,helvetica,sans-serif;font-size:small" class="gmail_default"><br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">
<br>
- lispworks is not listed on getting started download page, but allegro<br>
is (since two free implementations are listed, it would be justified to<br>
mention two most popular commercial ones)<br>
<br>
Best regards,<br>
Daniel<br>
<br>
</blockquote></div><br clear="all"><br>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr"><div></div>Ray<br></div></div></div></div></div>