<div dir="ltr"><div>Hi all,<br></div><div dir="ltr"><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote" dir="auto"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">> I'm thinking to point the project page to the source repository (e.g.<br>
> GitLab) when the project has sources, but doesn't have a project page.<br>
<br>
That is a really good idea.<br></blockquote></div><div dir="auto"><br></div><div dir="auto">Ok, I know which projects don't have their project page replaced. I can publish that list here tomorrow.</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Of all the projects which don't have a front page (list at the end of this mail), these don't have a git repository in GitLab:</div><div><br></div><div>arxana<br>asdf-install<br>asdf-packaging<br>boston-lisp<br>chemboy<br>cl-amqp<br>cl-buchberger<br>cl-cactus-kev<br>cl-captcha<br>cl-clickatell<br>cl-gdbm<br>cl-gtk2<br>clint<br>cl-lazy-list<br>cl-lexer<br>cl-match<br>cl-ode<br>clotnet<br>cl-peg<br>cl-player<br>cl-rundown<br>cltl3<br>cl-yacc-ebnf<br>common-math<br>decl<br>defmud<br>docutrack<br>fset<br>graphic-forms<br>innen<br>israel-lisp<br>jess-parse<br>lisp-interface-library<br>mit-cadr<br>mk-defsystem<br>movies<br>objective-cl<br>phorplay<br>same<br>sqlisp<br>tioga<br>trivial-features<br>trivial-shell<br>ucs-sort<br>umpa-lumpa<br>xml-psychiatrist<br></div><div><br></div><div>Of these, these 4 seem to have a subversion repository though:</div><div><br></div><div>common-math</div><div>fset</div><div>graphic-forms</div><div>mit-cadr</div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>So I propose to remove from the site <a href="http://common-lisp.net">common-lisp.net</a>, the following 42 projects (after contacting their respective project members):</div><div><br></div><div><div>arxana<br>asdf-install<br>asdf-packaging<br>boston-lisp<br>chemboy<br>cl-amqp<br>cl-buchberger<br>cl-cactus-kev<br>cl-captcha<br>cl-clickatell<br>cl-gdbm<br>cl-gtk2<br>clint<br>cl-lazy-list<br>cl-lexer<br>cl-match<br>cl-ode<br>clotnet<br>cl-peg<br>cl-player<br>cl-rundown<br>cltl3<br>cl-yacc-ebnf<br>decl<br>defmud<br>docutrack<br>innen<br>israel-lisp<br>jess-parse<br>lisp-interface-library<br>mk-defsystem<br>movies<br>objective-cl<br>phorplay<br>same<br>sqlisp<br>tioga<br>trivial-features<br>trivial-shell<br>ucs-sort<br>umpa-lumpa<br>xml-psychiatrist<br></div><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>The remaining 69 projects will have their project page redirected to the GitLab group page (or in case there's only a Subversion repository, to Trac).<br></div></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex"><div dir="auto"><div class="gmail_quote" dir="auto"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left:1px solid rgb(204,204,204);padding-left:1ex">

> As for the projects which never spawned code, I'm wondering: should we<br>
> simply remove those off the system (after contacting the project members,<br>
> of course)? I mean, there's little Common Lisp value in them...<br>
<br>
Definitely. They make the projects hub list frustrating to browse.<br>
<br></blockquote></div></div></blockquote><div><br></div></div><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">Ok. I hope that the above proposal addresses that.</div><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote">Regards,</div><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div><div class="gmail_quote"><br></div>-- <br><div dir="ltr" class="gmail_signature"><div dir="ltr">Bye,<div><br></div><div>Erik.</div><div><br></div><div><a href="http://efficito.com/" target="_blank">http://efficito.com</a> -- Hosted accounting and ERP.</div><div>Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.</div></div></div></div></div>