[clfswm-devel] rearrange windows
Fernando Aguayo
beren.olvar at gmail.com
Sun Nov 7 17:04:37 UTC 2010
> Done in the last commit. In fact, I've added 8 lines (Lisp is
> wonderful!) to let you choose to keep or not children position in all
> tile layout since this can be useful sometimes.
>
> Please, test!
Works like a charm! thank you!
>
> While you seem to use tile layout, what do you think about impair
> frame-children? Actually there is a blank for the unused
> child. Something like this:
>
> +----+----+
> | F1 | 2 |
> +----+----+
> | 3 | B | B: blank F: focused child
> +----+----+
>
> What do you think about the blank filled by the focused child? Something
> like this:
>
> +----+----+
> | F1 |
> +----+----+
> | 2 | 3 | B: blank (no more) F: focused child
> +----+----+
>
>
Yes, I noted that, and I was thinking in making a patch to change
this. The problematic point is that it could get a bit ambiguous. For
example, what happens when you have 5 windows? You probably want 3
columns and 2 rows, but which cell gets the extra space? That's why I
prefer manual tiling, but in my opinion, for that you also need some
way to interactively resize the partition of the frame.
So I'm really not sure, but maybe just granting the first one more
room is good enough.
>
> >>
> >> Note: The funny thing is that the function you want is the first I've
> >> written in clfswm-layout. And I've really thinking hard to keep children
> >> in there position :)
> >>
> >
> > Probably that's the more general way to go, It's just I'm probably too
> > used to other manual tilers :P
> >
> Arf, in fact I'd like clfswm to be turned in any tiled (or not) window
> manager following user request. This let us freedom to (auto)arange
> windows as we like.
That would be great, but also very complicated. I think the number of
options is already good. Just need some little tweakings :)
Again, thank you, I'm really enjoing using this wm.
Regards
Fernando
More information about the clfswm-devel
mailing list