From Top at common-lisp.net  Fri May  9 18:28:03 2008
From: Top at common-lisp.net (Top at common-lisp.net)
Date: 10 May 2008 02:28:03 +0800
Subject: [clbuild-devel] 1000s Of Hits From Google, Yahoo,
	MSN And Others At $0 Cost To You !
Message-ID: <20080510022803.85A7852302E15565@from.header.has.no.domain>


As incredible as it may sound you're about to discover a system how you

can drive 1000s of potential customers to any website or affiliate website 
at $0 cost to you!What if I told you that I'm making thousands of dollars 
each week and I'm not paying a
dime for advertising ?

Google, Yahoo, MSN and others are sending me hundreds of new customers 
every week
- at $0 cost! Make Money On Auto-Pilot While You're Sleeping Or Even On 
Vacation?
STOP Everything You Are Doing and Read This Now!

This works for any product, website or affiliate website!

FOR FULL DETAILS PLEASE READ THE ATTACHED .HTML FILE











To Unsubscribe
Please read the attached .html file
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://mailman.common-lisp.net/pipermail/clbuild-devel/attachments/20080510/90645322/attachment.htm>

From bryan.emrys at gmail.com  Mon May 12 01:50:57 2008
From: bryan.emrys at gmail.com (Bryan Emrys)
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 18:50:57 -0700
Subject: [clbuild-devel] [patch] Add weblocks
In-Reply-To: <ftotcb$786$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <ftotcb$786$1@ger.gmane.org>
Message-ID: <200805111850.57676.bryan.emrys@gmail.com>

Any response on weblocks? I would just as soon not have to maintain my own branch.

On a slightly different matter, I also asked on the elephant list about fixing whatever they might need to get off the blacklist. 

Bryan

On Friday 11 April 2008 04:48:30 pm Sohail Somani wrote:
> Weblocks has a *huge* set of dependencies, so I've added those as well.
> 
> Please see attached patch. I accidentally checked in the manually edited 
> dependencies so please ignore that.
> 
> Works For Me (TM)
>


From sohail at taggedtype.net  Mon May 12 02:17:11 2008
From: sohail at taggedtype.net (Sohail Somani)
Date: Sun, 11 May 2008 19:17:11 -0700
Subject: [clbuild-devel] [patch] Add weblocks
In-Reply-To: <200805111850.57676.bryan.emrys@gmail.com>
References: <ftotcb$786$1@ger.gmane.org>
	<200805111850.57676.bryan.emrys@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <4827A8A7.70808@taggedtype.net>

Bryan,

I did not get one (or missed it!) Does this work for you as well?

Bryan Emrys wrote:
> Any response on weblocks? I would just as soon not have to maintain my own branch.
> 
> On a slightly different matter, I also asked on the elephant list about fixing whatever they might need to get off the blacklist. 
> 
> Bryan
> 
> On Friday 11 April 2008 04:48:30 pm Sohail Somani wrote:
>> Weblocks has a *huge* set of dependencies, so I've added those as well.
>>
>> Please see attached patch. I accidentally checked in the manually edited 
>> dependencies so please ignore that.
>>
>> Works For Me (TM)
>>
> 


-- 
Sohail Somani
http://uint32t.blogspot.com


From davidjneu at gmail.com  Mon May 12 14:33:51 2008
From: davidjneu at gmail.com (David J. Neu)
Date: Mon, 12 May 2008 10:33:51 -0400
Subject: [clbuild-devel] sbcl command line args
Message-ID: <20080512143351.GA34140@bach.davidneu.local>

All,

Does the "clbuild lisp" pass on command line args to sbcl?

In particular, does

./clbuild lisp --dynamic-space-size 1500

work?

Many thanks!

Cheers,
David


From bryan.emrys at gmail.com  Wed May 14 06:25:48 2008
From: bryan.emrys at gmail.com (Bryan Emrys)
Date: Tue, 13 May 2008 23:25:48 -0700
Subject: [clbuild-devel] Fwd: Re: [elephant-devel] Clbuild
Message-ID: <200805132325.48462.bryan.emrys@gmail.com>

David,

They (the elephant team) are trying to address the clbuild concerns. Thoughts?

Bryan
----------  Forwarded Message  ----------

Subject: Re: [elephant-devel] Clbuild
Date: Tuesday 13 May 2008
From: "Robert L. Read" <read at robertlread.net>
To: Bryan Emrys <bryan.emrys at gmail.com>

Dear Bryan and Team,
	I have now removed the explicit load of cl-sql (I think) and put an
sbcl pragma around an explicit depend in both the "elephant" darcs
branch and the "elephant-unstable" darcs branch.
	
	I observe the following comments in the CLBUILD wnpp-projects file,
which you mentioned:

# endless problems:
#  - doesn't build at all without a user-written my-config.sexp
#  - needs sb-posix, but doesn't declare that dependency, meaning that
#    it doesn't build even with a config file
#  - ele-clsql loads clsql from the .asd file, not using :depends-on,
#    which is completely unacceptable
#    (we blacklist ele-clsql in clbuild.lisp because of that)
elephant         get_darcs http://www.common-lisp.net/project/elephant/darcs/elephant


... so it is possible that the second and third problem are solved from your point of view.

However, the first problem may require some creativity.

It seems to me the best we could hope for is to modify our build to use our standard template,
"config.sexp", if my-config.sexp doesn't exist, and blare a warning that you probably should
understand and set those defaults yourself.  If we did that, perhaps on most systems (85%) it
would build, but it will remain fragile (not least of all to new revisions of BDB).
It might build more reliably for a CL-SQL backend or a postmodern backend, but of course you
can't use those systems without knowing at least that your have to have postgres and run "createdb test",
for example.


Does this sound like a reasonable solution?






-------------------------------------------------------


From davidjneu at gmail.com  Sat May 17 19:10:13 2008
From: davidjneu at gmail.com (David J. Neu)
Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 15:10:13 -0400
Subject: [clbuild-devel] suggestions on how to handle failing tests?
Message-ID: <20080517191013.GB60460@bach.davidneu.local>

Hi,

Not sure if this is a clbuild or cffi question.

I'm using clbuild with sbcl.  The following

./clbuild build cffi

encounters errors, it looks like in the cffi-tests.

Any way to tell clbuild (or is it cffi) to skip the tests?

Cheers,
David



From davidjneu at gmail.com  Tue May 20 22:05:28 2008
From: davidjneu at gmail.com (David J. Neu)
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 18:05:28 -0400
Subject: [clbuild-devel] suggestions on how to handle failing tests?
In-Reply-To: <200805190728.32783.bryan.emrys@gmail.com>
References: <20080517191013.GB60460@bach.davidneu.local>
	<200805190728.32783.bryan.emrys@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20080520220528.GA73114@bach.davidneu.local>

Thanks for the response.

Including "cffi-tests" in *blacklisted-systems* works.

Note, I'm testing this on 64-bit Linux, and w/out "blacklisting" cffi
./clbuild build cffi 
yields

Loading cffi-examples...
Loading cffi-grovel...
Loading cffi-tests...
unhandled SIMPLE-ERROR in thread #<SB-THREAD:THREAD "initial thread" {10024291C1}>:
  Error during processing of --eval option "(load \"/home/djneu/apps/clbuild-sbcl-unicode/clbuild.lisp\")":

  erred while invoking #<COMPILE-OP (:VERBOSE NIL) {1002A02B01}> on
  #<C-TEST-LIB "libtest" {1002940911}>

0: (SB-DEBUG::MAP-BACKTRACE #<CLOSURE (LAMBDA #) {1003C452D9}>)[:EXTERNAL]
1: (BACKTRACE 128 #<SYNONYM-STREAM :SYMBOL SB-SYS:*STDERR* {100012ABB1}>)
2: (SB-DEBUG::DEBUGGER-DISABLED-HOOK
    #<SIMPLE-ERROR {1003C3F001}>
    #<unavailable argument>)
3: (INVOKE-DEBUGGER #<SIMPLE-ERROR {1003C3F001}>)
4: (INVOKE-DEBUGGER #<SIMPLE-ERROR {1003C3F001}>)[:EXTERNAL]
5: (ERROR
    "Error during processing of --eval ~
                                    option ~S:~%~%  ~A")[:EXTERNAL]
6: ((LAMBDA (SB-IMPL::E)) #<ASDF:OPERATION-ERROR {1003C3E931}>)
7: ((LAMBDA (SB-IMPL::E)) #<ASDF:OPERATION-ERROR {1003C3E931}>)[:EXTERNAL]
8: (SIGNAL #<ASDF:OPERATION-ERROR {1003C3E931}>)[:EXTERNAL]
9: (ERROR ASDF:OPERATION-ERROR)[:EXTERNAL]
10: ((SB-PCL::FAST-METHOD ASDF:PERFORM
      (ASDF:COMPILE-OP CFFI-TESTS-SYSTEM::C-TEST-LIB))
     #<unavailable argument>
     #<unavailable argument>
     #<ASDF:COMPILE-OP (:VERBOSE NIL) {1002A02B01}>
     #<CFFI-TESTS-SYSTEM::C-TEST-LIB "libtest" {1002940911}>)
11: ((LAMBDA
         (SB-PCL::.PV. SB-PCL::.NEXT-METHOD-CALL. SB-PCL::.ARG0.
          SB-PCL::.ARG1.))
     #<unavailable argument>
     #<unavailable argument>
     #<ASDF:COMPILE-OP (:VERBOSE NIL) {1002A02B01}>
     #<CFFI-TESTS-SYSTEM::C-TEST-LIB "libtest" {1002940911}>)
12: ((LAMBDA ()))
13: ((FLET SB-THREAD::WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK-THUNK))
14: ((FLET #:WITHOUT-INTERRUPTS-BODY-[CALL-WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK]520))
15: (SB-THREAD::CALL-WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK
     #<CLOSURE (FLET SB-THREAD::WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK-THUNK) {7FC04E09B059}>
     #S(SB-THREAD:MUTEX
        :NAME "big compiler lock"
        :%OWNER #<SB-THREAD:THREAD "initial thread" {10024291C1}>
        :STATE 1))
16: (SB-C::%WITH-COMPILATION-UNIT #<CLOSURE (LAMBDA #) {1003A975F9}>)[:EXTERNAL]
17: (ASDF:OPERATE ASDF:LOAD-OP "cffi-tests")[:EXTERNAL]
18: ((FLET CLBUILD::BUILD))
19: ((LAMBDA ()))
20: (SB-INT:SIMPLE-EVAL-IN-LEXENV
     (CLBUILD::WITH-APPLICATION
      (CLBUILD::PROJECTS-STRING &KEY CLBUILD::DUMP CLBUILD::VERBOSE
       CLBUILD::FORCE)
      (LET ((CLBUILD::PROJECTS
             (CL-PPCRE:SPLIT "\\s+" CLBUILD::PROJECTS-STRING))
            (CLBUILD::BLACKLISTED-SYSTEMS
             (UNLESS CLBUILD::FORCE CLBUILD::*BLACKLISTED-SYSTEMS*))
            (CLBUILD::SKIPPED-SYSTEMS 'NIL)
            (*PACKAGE* (FIND-PACKAGE :CL-USER)))
        (SETF CLBUILD::PROJECTS (SORT CLBUILD::PROJECTS #'STRING-LESSP))
        (FLET ((CLBUILD::BUILD ()
                 (DOLIST (CLBUILD::PROJECT CLBUILD::PROJECTS)
                   (DOLIST
                       (CLBUILD::SYSTEM
                        (CLBUILD::PROJECT-TO-SYSTEMS CLBUILD::PROJECT))
                     (COND
                      ((FIND CLBUILD::SYSTEM CLBUILD::BLACKLISTED-SYSTEMS :TEST
                             #'EQUAL)
                       (PUSH CLBUILD::SYSTEM CLBUILD::SKIPPED-SYSTEMS))
                      (T (FORMAT T "Loading ~A...~%" CLBUILD::SYSTEM)
                       (ASDF:OPERATE 'ASDF:LOAD-OP CLBUILD::SYSTEM :VERBOSE
                                     CLBUILD::VERBOSE)))))))
          (IF CLBUILD::VERBOSE (CLBUILD::BUILD)
              (HANDLER-BIND
               ((STYLE-WARNING #'MUFFLE-WARNING)
                (COMPILER-NOTE #'MUFFLE-WARNING))
               (LET ((*COMPILE-VERBOSE* NIL)
                     (*COMPILE-PRINT* NIL)
                     (*LOAD-VERBOSE* NIL)
                     (*LOAD-PRINT* NIL))
                 (CLBUILD::BUILD)))))
        (WHEN CLBUILD::SKIPPED-SYSTEMS
          (FORMAT T "WARNING: The following black-listed systems were skipped: ~
                 ~{~A~^, ~}~%~
                Try --force t to include them.~%"
                  CLBUILD::SKIPPED-SYSTEMS))
        (WHEN CLBUILD::DUMP
          (FORMAT T "Dumping monster.core...~%")
          (FORCE-OUTPUT)
          (SAVE-LISP-AND-DIE "monster.core"))))
     #<NULL-LEXENV>)
21: (SB-FASL::LOAD-AS-SOURCE
     #<SB-SYS:FD-STREAM for "file /home/djneu/apps/clbuild-sbcl-unicode/clbuild.lisp" {1002EF26F1}>
     NIL
     NIL)
22: (SB-FASL::%LOAD
     #<SB-SYS:FD-STREAM for "file /home/djneu/apps/clbuild-sbcl-unicode/clbuild.lisp" {1002EF26F1}>)[:EXTERNAL]
23: (SB-FASL::%LOAD "/home/djneu/apps/clbuild-sbcl-unicode/clbuild.lisp")[:EXTERNAL]
24: (LOAD "/home/djneu/apps/clbuild-sbcl-unicode/clbuild.lisp")[:EXTERNAL]
25: (SB-INT:SIMPLE-EVAL-IN-LEXENV
     (LOAD "/home/djneu/apps/clbuild-sbcl-unicode/clbuild.lisp")
     #<NULL-LEXENV>)
26: (SB-IMPL::PROCESS-EVAL-OPTIONS
     ((DISABLE-DEBUGGER) "(require :asdf)"
      "(setq asdf:*central-registry* '(#p\"/home/djneu/apps/clbuild-sbcl-unicode/systems/\"))"
      "nil" "(load \"/home/djneu/apps/clbuild-sbcl-unicode/clbuild.lisp\")"))
27: (SB-IMPL::TOPLEVEL-INIT)
28: ((LABELS SB-IMPL::RESTART-LISP))



On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 07:28:32AM -0700, Bryan Emrys wrote:
> What were the errors? It built for me today.
> 
> If  it still doesn't work, you can include a line 
> 
> 	"cffi-tests"
> 
> in  the defparameter *blacklisted-systems* 
> 
> in the clbuild.lisp file.
> 
> That should exclude it from the build process.
> 
> Bryan
> 
> 
> On Saturday 17 May 2008 12:10:13 pm David J. Neu wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Not sure if this is a clbuild or cffi question.
> > 
> > I'm using clbuild with sbcl.  The following
> > 
> > ./clbuild build cffi
> > 
> > encounters errors, it looks like in the cffi-tests.
> > 
> > Any way to tell clbuild (or is it cffi) to skip the tests?
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > David
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > clbuild-devel mailing list
> > clbuild-devel at common-lisp.net
> > http://common-lisp.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/clbuild-devel
> >