demo-clasp-cxx build status

[Chris Kohlhepp]

Hello Chris,

I have it all working -- against master. Happy to submit a patch.

Do we have process for this or do I just post the patch to the mailing list?

Chris K


On 30/06/2015 8:41 am, Christian Schafmeister wrote:
> Chris,
>
> The master branch hasn’t been updated for a while - there have been lots of development and I’ve been wrestling them into shape so that I can do another release.
>
> I’m not quite ready yet but you could try building the 0.3-test-6 tag.
>
> Come join us in #clasp  if you want more details.
>
> Best,
>
> .Chris.
>
>
>
> On Jun 29, 2015, at 6:13 PM, Chris Kohlhepp <chrisk at manx.net> wrote:
>
>> Elaboration: Adding #pragma once fixes this problem.
>> Maybe add this to upstream generator "pump.py clbind_functoids.pmp"?
>>
>>
>> Chris K
>>
>> On 30/06/2015 8:09 am, Chris Kohlhepp wrote:
>>> Now the detail. What I'm seeing is this:
>>>
>>> n file included from helloWorld.cc:5:
>>> In file included from /Applications/Clasp/clasp/src/include/clasp.h:2:
>>> In file included from /Applications/Clasp/clasp/include/clasp/core/../clbind/clbind.h:34:
>>> In file included from /Applications/Clasp/clasp/include/clasp/clbind/class.h:147:
>>> In file included from /Applications/Clasp/clasp/include/clasp/clbind/constructor.h:265:
>>> /Applications/Clasp/clasp/src/clbind/bin/boehm/clang-darwin-4.2.1/release/link-static/clbind_functoids.h:13:7: error: redefinition of
>>>       'VariadicFunctoid<type-parameter-0-1 (*)(type-parameter-0-2, type-parameter-0-3, type-parameter-0-4, type-parameter-0-5, type-parameter-0-6, type-parameter-0-7,
>>>       type-parameter-0-8, type-parameter-0-9, type-parameter-0-10, type-parameter-0-11, type-parameter-0-12, type-parameter-0-13, type-parameter-0-14,
>>>       type-parameter-0-15, type-parameter-0-16, type-parameter-0-17), type-parameter-0-0>'
>>> class VariadicFunctoid
>>>       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>>> /Applications/Clasp/clasp/src/clbind/bin/boehm/clang-darwin-4.2.1/release/link-static/clbind_functoids.h:13:7: note: previous definition is here
>>> class VariadicFunctoid
>>>       ^
>>>
>>> Looks to me like this header is included twice as both references are the same.
>>> This header contains no header guards or pragma once statement.
>>> It also claims to be generated which means one really should not add those to the source.
>>>
>>> Best Regards
>>>
>>> Chris Kohlhepp
>>>
>>> On 30/06/2015 7:56 am, Chris Kohlhepp wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I have Clasp built and running on 10.9.4 using XCode 6.  Before going into detail, I wanted to briefly inquire if at present demo-clasp-cxx is expected to build, if so with what branch of Clasp? It used to be the preview branch but I noticed that elements of preview, most notably SICL et al are now in master.
>>>>
>>>> Please advice
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards
>>>>
>>>> Chris Kohlhepp
>>>>
>>